Supporting guidance for Rural Sustainable Drainage Systems – Wetland
Date published: 8 December, 2021
For recent changes to this guidance, please see the bottom of the page.
Table of Contents
- What needs to be done
- Design guidelines
- Factors affecting performance
- Further information
- Annex – Identifying run-off types
- Recent changes
- Previous versions
- Download guidance
Constructed wetlands are normally shallow ponds and marshy areas covered almost entirely in aquatic vegetation. They are designed to accept run-off that currently discharges direct to a watercourse and to hold it for long enough to allow sediments to settle and for pollutants to be removed through plant uptake and breakdown in the soil.
Designs for wetlands vary widely and can range from single-celled wetlands to systems with multiple stages incorporating other rural sustainable drainage systems features such as swales and ponds.
A constructed wetland can improve water quality by treating run-off from a steading or from fields, and can also provide significant biodiversity benefits. They can help to reduce levels of pollutants such as nutrients, bacteria and sediment.
In regards to steadings, wetlands are useful for accepting and treating run-off from clean or lightly contaminated yard areas, as part of a treatment train approach where the wetland accepts run-off from another feature such as a sediment trap and / or a swale.
Wetlands can also be used in-field as part of soil erosion risk management. For example, to capture down slope run-off along field boundaries or alongside farm tracks or roads.
What needs to be done
Drainage from a steading
Where it is proposed that the wetland will take drainage from a steading the first step should be to carry out a diffuse pollution steading assessment. The principle aim of this is to illustrate which parts of the yard areas will be suitable to be discharged to the wetland and to assess the current diffuse pollution risk.
See Annex: Identifying run-off types.
It is important that the assessment clearly identifies where the run-off originates from where it currently discharges to and how it currently gets there.
Where a new Rural SuDS or surface water drainage system is to be created it is important to ensure that these are not located within 10 meters of any slurry store, effluent tank, silage clamp or silage bale storage area.
It is important to note that wetlands are not appropriate for accepting more contaminated types of run-off, such as slurry.
The Control of Pollution (Silage, Slurry and Agricultural Fuel Oil) (Scotland) Regulations 2003 as amended does, however, allow certain types of run-off that have been contaminated with slurry, such as midden run-off, to be conveyed to a constructed farm wetland.
See Annex: Identifying run-off types.
Such wetlands must be designed in accordance with the Constructed Farm Wetland Design Manual for Scotland and Northern Ireland, 2008.
All other types of steading wetlands which have not been designed in accordance with the manual must only accept run-off from clean areas.
For concrete yards/ tracks and farms buildings constructed after 1 April 2007 there is a statutory requirement (Controlled Activities Regulations GBR10) that any water runoff should be discharged via a Sustainable Urban Drainage System (SUD).
This excludes areas draining to a silage tank or slurry store.
Therefore applications for any RSuDS options may be considered as ineligible for cases where the entire farm steading or new buildings adjacent to the original steading have been built since 1 April 2007 without the benefit of any associated SUD.
Similarly, where a large proportion of the original steading has been redeveloped since 1 April 2007 it may be considered ineligible. If the redevelopment does not involve significant changes to the surface water drainage system and/ or increasing the amount of runoff discharging to a water course then the case may well be eligible.
Cases involving substantial changes to surface water drainage etc. with no associated RSuDS are likely to be ineligible.
For arable situations, the principle aim of the wetland will be to collect overland run-off to allow sediment to drop out. In grassland situations, the purpose may be to capture run-off from a track or road used by livestock or machinery and to discharge it to grassland away from watercourses.
For in-field wetlands, it will be necessary to carry out a simple diffuse pollution risk assessment to determine where the wetland should be created to be most effective:
- using a map, such as a copy of the IACS map, highlight all ditches, burns and rivers on the farm or area of land in question
- the next step is to consider where the potential for soil erosion is greatest and where this can pose a risk to the water environment
This assessment should be based on:
- proximity to nearby watercourses – the closer the area is to a watercourse, the greater will be the risk
- slope of the land will be one of the most significant factors – the steeper the downward slope towards the watercourse the greater will be the risk. Slopes of over three degrees (1 in 14) should be considered moderate risk and those above eight degrees (1 in 7) considered high risk. Fields with slopes which tend to converge or fall to a specific low point or corner of the field near to a watercourse will have a particular high risk of causing pollution. Long, uninterrupted slopes are also of greater risk of erosion
- past experience – consider where it has previously been noted that run-off has entered a watercourse or soil erosion has occurred
- soil texture – light soils with a high sand content are at greater risk of erosion
Once the assessment has been completed, identify on the map those areas that are of risk of soil erosion and which may potentially impact on a watercourse. Mark on the map where the wetland system would be best located to intercept the run-off and where it should discharge to.
Design depends on the type of wetland to be constructed and will be specific to the particular location. As stated above, constructed farm wetlands that are to be used to treat run-off that may be contaminated with slurry must be designed in accordance with the Constructed Farm Wetland Design Manual for Scotland and Northern Ireland, 2008.
For smaller wetlands which are designed to manage run-off from clean yard areas or fields the recently published (December 2016) guidance document - Rural Sustainable Drainage Systems - A Practical Design and Build Guide for Scotland’s Farmers and Landowners, should be referred to.
This guide was written with the Scottish Rural Development Programme in mind and will help you to select, size, design, and build the most suitable Rural SuDS for your farm.
Importantly, the above guidance document also explains how to look after the systems and maintain them which is essential in order to optimise their effectiveness.
It also promotes the wider benefits such as coping with extreme weather related to climate change, localised flood prevention and enhancing biodiversity.
Using a combination of RSuDS will be more effective than individual measures – the treatment train approach.
Factors affecting performance
- overloading and polluting with accidental spillage of chemicals or slurry. For steading wetlands, such risks can be reduced by taking actions such as effective clean and dirty water separation and good slurry management
- short circuiting and leakage can reduce effectiveness and should be considered at the design stage
- poor flow distribution such that the effective surface area is greatly reduced
- lack of treatment train approach – performance can be enhanced by using grass swales  to take run-off prior to the wetland
- wetlands that take run-off with a lot of dissolved soil, such as from arable fields, would benefit from use of silt traps first
- minimise the volume or level of contaminated run-off that the wetland must deal with. On a steading, several localised grass swales (or grass margins serving as a filter strip) may be a more practical option than creating one large feature. Within an arable field, steps such as running tramlines across slopes, relieving compaction etc will help to reduce the risk of soil erosion
 Cooper P (2007). The Constructed Wetland Association UK database of constructed wetland systems. Water Sci & Technol. 2007;56(3):1–6. Also Constructed Wetlands Association
 Carty A, Scholz M, Heal K, Keohane J, Dunne E, Gouriveau F and Mustafa A (2008). Constructed Farm Wetlands (CFW) Design Manual for Scotland and Northern Ireland. Northern Ireland Environment Agency and Scottish Environment Protection Agency, 30.10.2008
 SEPA (2000). Ponds, Pools and Lochans. SEPA, Stirling
 Braskerud BC (2001). Sedimentation in Small Constructed Wetlands. Retention of Particles, Phosphorus and Nitrogen in Streams from Arable Watersheds. Doctor Scientiarum Theses 2001:10, Agricultural University of Norway, As, Norway. ISSN: 0802-3220
 Northern Ireland Environment Agency (2006). Guidance for Treating Lightly Contaminated Surface Run-off from Pig and Poultry Units. Supplementary Guidance for IPPC Applications. Report prepared by Carole Christian, Environmental Consultant
 Mackenzie SM and McIlwraith CI (2013). Constructed farm wetlands – treating agricultural water pollution and enhancing biodiversity. Produced by Wildfowl and Wetlands Trust with Natural England. May 2013
Annex – Identifying run-off types
In general, farm steadings, particularly livestock farms, produce a wide range of run-off ranging from relatively clean roof water to highly contaminated run-off and slurry.
Roof run-off can be considered relatively clean and may already directly discharge to a watercourse. Exceptions may include poultry or pig house roofs with roof vents. Also, any buildings or areas constructed after 1 April, 2007 must be drained by a sustainable drainage system, and roof water can discharge to a closed soakaway or to a watercourse via an infiltration trench or swale.
Yard run-off tends to vary to a greater degree in its polluting load. Therefore, for the purpose of producing the plan for this option, run-off should be classified as:
Slurry and silage effluent
The Control of Pollution (Silage, Slurry and Agricultural Fuel Oil) (Scotland) Regulations 2003 as amended (SSAFO) defines slurry as excreta produced by livestock while in a yard or building and includes a mixture of run-off containing excreta, bedding etc, from yards and buildings used by livestock and middens, weeping wall structures etc.
Silage effluent is defined by SSAFO to include effluent produced from any forage crop which is being made or has been made into silage.
This will also include any mixture consisting wholly of or containing such effluent or run-off emanating from a silo or silage effluent collection system.
Run-off from such areas requires to be collected in a suitable storage system. However there is a provision to allow certain types of slurry and silage effluent to be conveyed to a constructed farm wetland that has been designed in accordance with the Constructed Farm Wetland Design Manual. The types of slurry that can be conveyed to such constructed farm wetlands for treatment includes run-off which mainly consists of rainwater and washings which derive from:
- an outdoor midden containing farmyard manure
- a midden which mainly contains farm yard manure and is situated where its contents can be affected directly by precipitation,
- any uncovered yard, used by livestock occasionally to move from one area to another,
- a yard which is used for the gathering or holding of livestock no more than once a week and which can be directly affected by precipitation,
Slurry must not be drained through a constructed farm wetland from areas -
- where livestock are gathered or held more than once a week, or
- used for livestock movement or holding prior to, during or after being -
- housed, or
- which may be contaminated with pesticide
Silage effluent which consists mainly of rainwater may be drained through a constructed farm wetland only if -
(i) the silo is open for use,
(ii) the drainage of the silage effluent from the silo to the constructed farm wetland is direct and through a separate channel or pipe from the base of the silo,
(iii) no crop is added to the silo whilst it is open.
All reasonable steps must be taken to ensure that the drainage of slurry through a constructed farm wetland does not cause pollution of the water environment.
Lightly contaminated run-off
This could include drainage from yards and areas where livestock do not frequently have access, which are not contaminated with oils and pesticides. It is accepted that such areas will build up a degree of contamination from passing machinery and other activities carried on nearby. In the majority of cases this run-off would be suitable for treatment via a rural sustainable drainage system or alternatively could discharge to local grassed areas.
This includes washings from the milking parlour and rinsings from the milk storage tank(s), milking machine and ancillary equipment. These types of effluent can be highly polluting and should be collected in a slurry storage facility or a dedicated storage tank.
Pesticide contaminated run-off
Drainage from pesticide handling and loading areas must not be allowed to discharge into a surface water drainage system or a rural sustainable drainage system. There is a capital item available for upgrading pesticide handling facilities.
|Further information||Removal / insertion of information links|
|Annex A - slurry and silage effluent||Text changes and updates|
Click 'Download this page' to create a printable version of this guidance you can save or print out.